BLUEMOUNTAIN MONTENVERS MASTER FUND SCA SICAV-SIF

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with BLUEMOUNTAIN MONTENVERS MASTER FUND SCA SICAV-SIF

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BLUEMOUNTAIN MONTENVERS MASTER FUND SCA SICAV-SIF is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
STARR COUNTY NURSING AND TRANSITIONAL CARE Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 RIO GRANDE CITY, TX Ranking: #3 out of 3 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with BLUEMOUNTAIN MONTENVERS MASTER FUND SCA SICAV-SIF

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BLUEMOUNTAIN MONTENVERS MASTER FUND SCA SICAV-SIF was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Heritage Park Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing C Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 197 AUSTIN, TX Ranking: #25 out of 48 (Ranking List)
Robstown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 94 ROBSTOWN, TX Ranking: #19 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Val Verde Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 76 DEL RIO, TX Ranking: #3 out of 3 (Ranking List)
Windsor Mission Oaks Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 150 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #47 out of 76 (Ranking List)
Harlingen Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 HARLINGEN, TX Ranking: #5 out of 19 (Ranking List)
Ebony Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 122 BROWNSVILLE, TX Ranking: #4 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Yoakum Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 110 YOAKUM, TX Ranking: #9 out of 11 (Ranking List)
Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 EDINBURG, TX Ranking: #12 out of 22 (Ranking List)
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 206 AUSTIN, TX Ranking: #33 out of 49 (Ranking List)
Weslaco Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 06/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 WESLACO, TX Ranking: #21 out of 29 (Ranking List)
Brownsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 BROWNSVILLE, TX Ranking: #11 out of 14 (Ranking List)
Windsor Atrium Most Recent Record: 06/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 HARLINGEN, TX Ranking: #16 out of 19 (Ranking List)
Windsor Arbor View Most Recent Record: 06/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 EDINBURG, TX Ranking: #8 out of 22 (Ranking List)
Remington Transitional Care of San Antonio Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 60 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #8 out of 74 (Ranking List)
Remington Transitional Care of Richardson Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 90 RICHARDSON, TX Ranking: #79 out of 127 (Ranking List)
Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care Most Recent Record: 02/01/2021 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 MISSION, TX Ranking: #3 out of 22 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.